Hi!, I would like to know (and underestand) the rationale behind this. I see that this could be beneficial for simplicity, but it doesn’t help if you want to go a little further, but maybe there is a theoretical foundation for it.
In my case, I would like to have:
sealed trait Evt case class E1 sealed trait EvtRS extends Evt case class E2 extends EvtRS case class E3 extends EvtRS
as a way to express that from all my events, only
E3 should be handled in the read side.
Then I would like to write:
and the pattern matching will tell me if I forgot to handle any
_ <: EvtRS.